You've probably seen an illustration of a gravity well, something like this:

Whenever I saw these gravity well depictions in school I mistakenly assumed they depicted gravity. They don't. These gravity wells depict gravitational potential, not gravity. Gravitational potential tells you how much time is warped and how slow local time will progress due to general relativity. It is not, however, correlated to what local gravity is. These "gravity wells" are better thought of as "gravitational potential wells".

Another problem is that these illustrations work fine for distances far away from massive bodies, but in regions of massive space, it is not how gravity works. For example, Xkcd's depiction relates planet radius to gravity. That depiction shows gravity up to the surface of the planets, but then sneakily substitutes gravity with planet radius. The presentation obscures that no information about gravity inside of the planets is provided! These depictions we've all seen our whole lives all share one blunder: they do not show how gravity works

**in**massive bodies.So then, what do gravity wells look like near and in massive bodies? To illustrate, let's envision an empty area of space with a one light year radius and a single celestial body, for example Earth, in the center.

To establish current understanding, in this thought experiment where is the least and most gravity?

Based on the gravity well depiction, one might assume someone standing on the edge of this miniverse would experience the least gravity and someone standing in the middle would experience the most.

That's a reasonable answer based on previous depictions, but it's not true.

Where is the most gravity in Earth? Could it be the Dead Sea, the North Pole, the Mariana Trench, or Mt. Everest?

Consider this graph of Earth's gravity according to the Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM). The area of most gravity is almost 3,000 km below Earth's surface about halfway to the core. The point of least gravity is the center of the planet.

**The points of both most and least gravity are both below the planet's surface!**

The answer to our previous hypothetical was wrong. A miniverse with an Earth like mass has the point of least gravity at the center and the area of most gravity below the body's surface.

To match traditional gravity well depictions Earth's gravity graph can be flipped so that low gravity is up and high gravity is down. Mirroring the graph then shows a path down to the core and back up again. The result is a sombrero cross section of Earth's gravity. Note the highest point in gravity well, the point of least gravity, is inside of the planet and not on the edges. The edges approach zero, but will never reach it.

How does this relate to general relativity and time dilation? Although said frequently, gravitational time dilation is not dependent on acceleration.

**Time dilation is always dependent on velocity.**This is obvious for special relativity. In the case of gravity wells, time dilation is dependent on

**escape velocity**; acceleration isn't needed in any of the calculations. The higher the value for escape velocity, the larger the time dilation. The point of the most time dilation is the center of Earth, while the least time dilation is the point furthest away from Earth.

To match the traditional 3D depiction, Earth's gravity well looks something like this.

Gravity wells are not just dips. Gravity wells are sombreros.

Gravity wells are not just dips. Gravity wells are sombreros.